This section reacts into the relevan concern “ exactly exactly What maybe you have discovered?“ Ergo, just representative outcomes from your quest must certanly be presented. The outcome must certanly be necessary for discussion.

Statistical guidelines

  • Indicate the analytical tests combined with all appropriate parameters: e.g., suggest and deviation that is standardSD): 44% (±3); median and interpercentile range: 7 years (4.5 to 9.5 years).
  • Use mean and deviation that is standard report usually distributed information.
  • Utilize median and interpercentile range to report skewed information.
  • For figures, utilize two significant digits unless more accuracy is important (2.08, maybe maybe maybe not 2.07856444).
  • Never ever make use of percentages for really little examples e.g., „one away from two“ really should not be changed by 50%.

Nevertheless, understand that many journals provide the chance for including Supporting Materials, therefore make use of them easily for data of additional value. This way, usually do not try to „hide“ data within the hope of saving it for the paper that is later. You may lose proof to bolster your summary. If information are way too numerous, you need to use those materials that are supplementary.

Utilize sub-headings to help keep outcomes of the exact same kind together, that will be more straightforward to review and read. Quantity these sub-sections when it comes to capability of interior cross-referencing, but constantly taking into consideration the publisher’s Guide for Authors.

For the data, choose a rational purchase that tells an obvious tale and helps it be and simple to know. Generally speaking, this is when you look at the exact same purchase as presented into the techniques part.

A significant problem is that you should not consist of sources in this area; you may be presenting your results, which means you cannot make reference to legit other people right here. In the event that you relate to other people, is mainly because you might be speaking about your outcomes, and this needs to be contained in the Discussion area.divider|Because you may be speaking about your outcomes, and also this needs to be within the Discussion part.divider if you relate to other people, is

Write the Discussion

right Here you need to answer exactly what the outcomes suggest. Most likely this is the simplest area to create, nevertheless the most difficult area to have appropriate. The reason being it will be the many important portion of your article. Right right Here you will get the chance to market important computer data. Remember the fact that a massive variety of manuscripts are refused since the Discussion is poor.

You’ll want to result in the Discussion corresponding towards the Results, but don’t reiterate the outcomes. right right Here you ought to compare the posted outcomes by your colleagues with yours (using a few of the sources included in the Introduction). Never ever ignore operate in disagreement that you are correct or better with yours, in turn, you must confront it and convince the reader.

Look at the following tips:

1. Prevent statements that exceed just just what the total outcomes can help.

2. Avoid unspecific expressions such as „higher temperature“, „at a lower life expectancy rate“, „highly significant“. Quantitative descriptions are often preferred (35єC, 0.5%, p Minimize individual communications, usually do not add unpublished findings, manuscripts submitted although not yet accepted for book, magazines that aren’t peer evaluated, grey literature, or articles maybe perhaps not posted in English.

When I have actually mentioned, you will discover the absolute most respected information for every single journal’s policy on citations whenever you consult the log’s Guide for Authors. As a whole, you really need to minmise communications that are personal and become mindful on how you consist of unpublished findings. These will likely to be essential for some procedures, but start thinking about if they strengthen or weaken your paper. You may additionally give consideration to articles posted on research sites ahead of book, but think about balancing these citations with citations of peer-reviewed research. Whenever citing research in languages aside from English, be familiar with the chance that not everybody within the review procedure will talk the language regarding the cited paper and therefore it might be useful to look for a translation where feasible.

Any software can be used by you, such as for instance EndNote or Mendeley, to format you need to include your recommendations when you look at the paper. Most journals have finally the likelihood to install small files with the structure for the recommendations, enabling you to change it automatically. Additionally, Elsevier’s Your Paper your path system waves strict formatting needs for the original distribution of the manuscript provided that it has all of the important elements being presented here.

Result in the guide list as well as the in-text citation conform strictly towards the design provided within the Guide for Authors. Understand that presentation associated with the sources into the format that is correct the obligation for the writer, perhaps maybe perhaps not the editor. Checking the structure is generally a big task for the editors. Make their work easier in addition they shall appreciate the time and effort.

Finally, always always check the annotated following:

  • Spelling of writer names
  • Of publications year
  • Usages of „et al.“
  • Punctuation
  • Whether all sources are included

Within my next article, i shall offer strategies for composing the manuscript, authorship, and exactly how to create a compelling resume cover letter. Stay tuned!divider

Recommendations and Acknowledgements

We have based this paper regarding the materials distributed towards the attendees of several courses. It’s encouraged by numerous Guides for writers of Elsevier journals. A number of this info is additionally featured in Elsevier’s Publishing Connect tutorials. In addition, i’ve consulted a few website pages:,

I would like to acknowledge Dr. Christiane Barranguet, Executive Publisher of Aquatic Sciences at Elsevier, on her constant help. And I also wish to thank Dr. Alison Bert, Editor-in-Chief of Elsevier Connect; without her help, this show might have been impossible to finish.

Related Tales

In this brand new series — “How to get ready a Manuscript for Global Journals” — a practiced editor provides advice to enhance your likelihood of acceptance

A student writes in regards to the inspiration behind their model for earthquake forecast – and exactly just exactly what he discovered on their (“tedious but well worth it”) journey to book

Whatever they don’t constantly let you know before you join for graduate college

The perfect research system you envision is certainly not exactly just what it appears to be

Journal editors expose the utmost effective reasons a manuscript gets published

Tips for Authors through the Publishing Connect Training Webcasts Channel

A log editor reveals the very best reasons numerous manuscripts don’t ensure it is to your review process that is peer